LOUISIANA STATE LAWS
LAW CONFIRMATION
Law or Bill: Act No. 15 (House Bill 431) — Modified Comparative Fault Act
Official Title: An Act Providing Relative to Modified Comparative Fault
Effective Date: January 1, 2026
Primary Sources:
Louisiana Legislature Civil Code amendments: legis.la.gov
LAW SUMMARY
What it does: Changes Louisiana’s civil law to use a modified comparative fault system for personal injury cases, affecting how damages are reduced based on the plaintiff’s share of fault.
Cost to taxpayers or employers: NOT SPECIFIED IN PUBLIC RECORDS
Who it affects: Individuals filing personal injury lawsuits, insurance companies, and legal professionals.
Who sponsored or initiated it: Louisiana House of Representatives and Senate; signed by Governor Jeff Landry.
Who opposed it or concerns raised: Some trial lawyers and consumer advocates worried it could limit compensation for plaintiffs with partial fault.
✅ PROS
Clarifies and modernizes fault allocation in civil cases.
Can reduce frivolous lawsuits.
Helps insurance companies predict liability costs.
❌ CONS
May reduce recovery for partially at‑fault plaintiffs.
Could be complex to apply in some cases.
Potential legal challenges during implementation.
THE BALLOT BEACON TAKEAWAY:
Louisiana adopts a modified comparative fault system in 2026, changing how civil injury damages are calculated.
LAW CONFIRMATION
Law or Bill: Act No. 404 (Senate Bill 28) — Fortified Roof Tax Credit Program
Official Title: An Act to Enact the Louisiana Fortified Roof Tax Credit Program
Effective Date: January 1, 2026
Primary Sources:
Enrolled bill text — Louisiana Legislature: legis.la.gov
LAW SUMMARY
What it does: Provides a state tax credit for homeowners who install fortified roofs meeting specific safety standards to withstand severe weather.
Cost to taxpayers or employers: Potential reduction in state tax revenue depending on program uptake; exact cost NOT SPECIFIED IN PUBLIC RECORDS
Who it affects: Homeowners, roofing contractors, and insurance companies.
Who sponsored or initiated it: Louisiana Legislature; signed by Governor Jeff Landry.
Who opposed it or concerns raised: NOT SPECIFIED IN PUBLIC RECORDS
✅ PROS
Encourages safer, storm-resistant homes.
May reduce property damage during hurricanes and storms.
Supports the local roofing industry.
❌ CONS
Reduces state tax revenue.
Requires homeowners to invest upfront in fortified roofs.
Administrative oversight needed for credit claims.
THE BALLOT BEACON TAKEAWAY:
Louisiana offers a tax credit for fortified roofs in 2026, promoting safer homes while impacting state revenue.
LAW CONFIRMATION
Law or Bill: House Bill 519 — Hands‑Free Driving Enforcement Law
Official Title: Expanded Hands‑Free Distracted Driving Enforcement
Effective Date: January 1, 2026
Primary Sources:
Louisiana news coverage: wafb.com
LAW SUMMARY
What it does: Begins full enforcement of Louisiana’s hands‑free mobile device driving ban; drivers using handheld phones while driving can be fined.
Cost to taxpayers or employers: NOT SPECIFIED IN PUBLIC RECORDS
Who it affects: All licensed drivers in Louisiana; law enforcement agencies.
Who sponsored or initiated it: Louisiana Legislature; signed by Governor Jeff Landry.
Who opposed it or concerns raised: Some drivers and advocacy groups argued about enforcement difficulty and fairness.
✅ PROS
Reduces distracted driving accidents.
Standardizes statewide traffic safety rules.
Encourages safer driving habits.
❌ CONS
Enforcement challenges for police officers.
Potential fines for unaware or accidental violations.
Some view it as government overreach.
THE BALLOT BEACON TAKEAWAY:
Louisiana enforces hands‑free driving rules in 2026, aiming to improve road safety while raising practical enforcement concerns.
LAW #1: ACT 32 / SB 52 — TAX-EXEMPTION FOR GRANTS FROM THE FORTIFY HOMES PROGRAM
Official Title: Provide an individual income tax exemption for grants from the Louisiana Fortify Homes Program. (Gov sig) (Louisiana Legislature)
Effective Date: August 1, 2025 (Louisiana Legislature)
FORTIFY HOMES GRANT TAX-EXEMPTION LAW
What it does: Allows people who receive grants through Louisiana’s Fortify Homes Program to exempt those grants from individual state income tax. (Louisiana Legislature) Aims to make those grants more effective by ensuring recipients don’t lose part of them to state taxation.
Cost to taxpayers / state budget: Some loss of tax revenue for the state because recipients won’t pay taxes on these grants. The fiscal note says $-$828,000 GF (General Fund) revenue reduction. (Louisiana Legislature) But the cost is relatively modest in the overall state budget.
Who it helps/affects: Recipients of Fortify Homes Program grants (likely homeowners or property owners using those funds). Potentially low- to moderate-income property owners who otherwise would pay taxes on those grants.
Who sponsored / initiated it: Senate Bill 52 (SB 52) in the Louisiana Legislature. (Louisiana Legislature)
Who opposed it / concerns raised: No strong public opposition noted in sources I saw. Some might argue about fairness — that grants are public funds and exemptions for them reduce tax base.
✅ PROS
Makes the Fortify Homes grants more valuable to recipients (they don’t lose a chunk to taxes).
Encourages use of the program by reducing cost burdens.
❌ CONS
Reduces state revenue (though modestly).
Could be seen as unfair by others receiving aid or programs not given similar breaks.
THE BALLOT BEACON TAKEAWAY:
Starting August 2025, Fortify Homes Program grant recipients in Louisiana can keep their grants tax-free on state income taxes — more benefit for homeowners, with a small loss to the state budget.
LAW #2: ACT 44 / SB 232 — MOTION PICTURE PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT UPDATES
Official Title: Provides relative to the motion picture production tax credit. (Gov.
sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF RV See Note) (Louisiana Legislature)
Effective Date: July 1, 2025 (Louisiana Legislature)
MOTION PICTURE PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT UPDATES (SB 232)
What it does: Adjusts or reforms the tax credit program for motion picture productions in Louisiana. (Louisiana Legislature) Likely changes who qualifies, how much credit they receive, or caps/limits on credits.
Cost to taxpayers / state budget: The fiscal note indicates there will be state budget impact ("GF RV See Note") — meaning General Fund revenue will be affected (some loss, possibly more incentives). (Louisiana Legislature) Benefits may be meant to attract and retain production projects, which bring jobs and economic activity, offsetting cost somewhat.
Who it helps/affects: Film & TV production companies, studios, workers in the film industry in Louisiana. Local businesses that benefit from production spending (hotels, suppliers, services). Taxpayers indirectly via economic growth, though also those who don’t benefit from production may see less revenue (less state funds).
Who sponsored / initiated it: Senate Bill 232 (SB 232) in 2025 Regular Session. (Louisiana Legislature)
Who opposed it / concerns raised: Some may argue tax credits are costly, possibly benefiting wealthy productions without enough return to the general public. Questions about accountability and ensuring that productions deliver on job creation and local spend.
✅ PROS
Encourages film/entertainment industry growth in Louisiana.
Can bring jobs, infrastructure investment, multiplier effect in local economies.
❌ CONS
Reduced state revenue due to credits.
Risk that productions import workers or resources instead of using local ones.
Possibility of over-generous credits that cost more than their economic benefit.
THE BALLOT BEACON TAKEAWAY:
SB 232 reforms Louisiana’s motion picture production tax credit (effective July 1, 2025), aiming to boost film industry activity at some cost to state revenue—balancing incentives vs. public payout.
LAW #3: ACT 31 / SB 51 — PUBLIC RECORDS FOR CITY OF ALEXANDRIA & PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY
Official Title: Provides for public power authority and public records for the city of Alexandria. (Act 31, SB 51) (Louisiana Legislature)
Effective Date: August 1, 2025 (Louisiana Legislature)
SB 51 — PUBLIC RECORDS LAW + PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY (ALEXANDRIA)
What it does: Modifies or sets requirements for public records for the City of Alexandria, particularly in relation to its Public Power Authority. (Louisiana Legislature) Likely increases transparency or changes how public power authority records are treated under public records laws.
Cost to taxpayers / state/local government: Administrative cost for Alexandria to comply: making documents available, possible system updates, staffing. Probably minimal ongoing cost once new systems in place.
Who it helps/affects: Residents of Alexandria who want better transparency into public power utilities (rates, decisions, records). The Public Power Authority (a utility provider) — more oversight. Local government must ensure compliance.
Who sponsored / initiated it: Senate Bill 51 in 2025 Regular Session. (Louisiana Legislature)
Who opposed it / concerns raised: No major opposition in sources I saw. Some possible concern from utility operations about costs or sharing proprietary data.
✅ PROS
Greater transparency in how public power utilities are run.
Residents get more access to records, potentially greater accountability.
❌ CONS
Additional administrative burden & cost to maintain public records.
Possible pushback from utility authority if some records are seen as sensitive.
THE BALLOT BEACON TAKEAWAY:
Starting August 1, 2025, SB 51 requires better transparency for Alexandria’s Public Power Authority via public records rules — increasing local accountability with modest cost.
LAW #4: ACT 38 / SB 92 — BANKS / BANKING: DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL RECORDS
Official Title: SB 92 – Provides relative to the disclosure of financial records. (Act 38) (Louisiana Legislature)
Effective Date: August 1, 2025 (Louisiana Legislature)
FINANCIAL RECORDS DISCLOSURE LAW (SB 92)
What it does: Changes or clarifies when banks or financial institutions must disclose certain financial records under Louisiana law. (Louisiana Legislature) Possibly modifies thresholds or rules for subpoenas, public transparency, or protection of customer privacy.
Cost to taxpayers / state/local government / banks: Financial institutions may see costs for compliance, processing requests or legal demands. State or judicial system may have to adjudicate disputes.
Who it helps/affects: Customers whose financial records may now have more privacy protections—or conversely may have more disclosure depending on law’s direction. Law enforcement, state agencies dependent on access to records. Banks / financial institutions with more legal/regulatory obligations.
Who sponsored / initiated it: Senate Bill 92 in 2025 Regular Session. (Louisiana Legislature)
Who opposed it / concerns raised: Some concerns from banks/financial institutions about privacy, cost, risk of overbroad disclosures. Privacy advocates likely interested in how the law balances disclosure vs confidentiality.
✅ PROS
Clarifies when financial records must be disclosed, which can improve transparency and help in investigations.
Could protect customers by setting firm rules and oversight.
❌ CONS
Risks to privacy if rules are too loose.
Burden on banks to respond to legal demands, possibly resource-intensive.
THE BALLOT BEACON TAKEAWAY:
SB 92 (Act 38) updates rules for when banks must share financial records in Louisiana as of August 1, 2025 — aims for clearer transparency in financial oversight, but with found-risks around privacy and compliance costs.