North Dakota State Laws

Law #1: HB 1066 — Minimum Wage for Senior Community Service Employment Program

📝 What it does

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Some cost for state (or federal/other funding) to pay older adults in the program more.

  • Depends on how many people are in the program and how much is appropriated.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: Older adults participating in the Senior Community Service Employment Program—they’ll earn more per hour now.

  • Affects: State department overseeing the program; budget office; funding sources.

🧑‍⚖️ Who sponsored / initiated & who opposed

  • Sponsored in the legislature (HB 1066). Specific sponsor(s) not in summary I found.

  • Likely supported by aging & workforce advocacy; opposition (if any) likely from budget hawks or those concerned about cost.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Improves pay for seniors in service roles; more fairness.

  • Helps reduce poverty / supplement incomes for older adults who volunteer or work in community service.

Cons:

  • Needs funding; if not appropriated fully, implementation may lag.

  • Might increase cost of program or reduce number of slots if budget constrained.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

ND’s HB 1066 ensures people in the Senior Community Service Employment Program get at least $12/hr (or more via rule), boosting pay for seniors—but it depends on funding and rulemaking to roll out.

Law #2: HB 1285 — State Employee Compensation Adjustments for Biennium 2025-27

📝 What it does

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Increased state payroll costs spread over two years.

  • Likely significant total dollar cost depending on number of employees.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: Permanent state employees—raises increase incomes.

  • Affects: State budget; possibly leads to trade-offs elsewhere.

🧑‍⚖️ Who sponsored / initiated & who opposed

  • Sponsored by ND legislature as part of the state budget / appropriation process.

  • Opposition could come from those concerned about state spending or taxpayer burden.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Helps state workers keep pace with inflation / cost of living.

  • Boosts morale, retention among state workforce.

Cons:

  • Adds to state expenses; depending on revenue, could stress budget.

  • If inflation remains high, raises may not keep up fully.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

As of July 2025, ND state government employees get a 3% raise, with another 2% raise in July 2026 — good news for public workers, but it adds pressure to the state’s budget.

Law #3: HB 1214 — School District Transportation Payments Reform

Statute / Bill: HB 1214 (2025), North Dakota 69th Legislative Assembly. “Payments for school district transportation of students, special education students, and career & technical education students …” (LegiScan)
Effective: The bill text provides an effective date (in statute) but I couldn’t find a public-source summary confirming when exactly it starts. It’s in 2025. (LegiScan)

📝 What it does (5th-grade level)

  • Changes how much money the state gives to school districts for transporting students, including regular students, special education students, and those in career/technical education. (LegiScan)

  • Updates the “transportation weighted student unit equivalents” (that’s a formula used to figure out payment amounts) so districts are paid differently based on how far kids travel, safety, etc. (LegiScan)

  • Repeals some older sections of the transportation payment code related to school district closure and distribution of funds when districts close. (LegiScan)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Likely an increase (or reallocation) of state education budget payments to reflect updated formulas. Depends on how much extra funding districts need under new rules. (LegiScan)

  • Some administrative cost for state and school districts to update reporting, payments, highway/travel cost calculations.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: School districts with students who travel long distances or have more expensive transport needs (special education, CTE).

  • Affects: Districts with lower transport costs may lose relative advantage; possibly taxpayers if state increases funding or changes taxation or allocations.

⚙️ Who sponsored / initiated & who opposed

  • Initiated by ND Legislature (bill HB 1214). (LegiScan)

  • Support probably from rural/distance school officials and transportation advocates. Opposition (if any) might come from districts that see reduced payments or from budget hawks worried about state costs.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • More fairness: districts get paid more accurately for what it costs to transport students.

  • Students in remote/special education/CTE benefit since transport costs are better recognized.

Cons:

  • Some districts may see less money if the formula shifts away from their advantage.

  • Implementation and budgeting challenges for districts.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

HB 1214 changes how North Dakota pays for student transportation (regular, special ed, and career/technical) — aiming for fairer funding, but some districts will benefit more than others and state budget pressure could rise. (LegiScan)

Law #4: $408.9 Million Property Tax Relief Package

Statute / Law: Property tax relief and reform passed in ND 2025 session. (“North Dakota Enacts $408.9 Million Property Tax Relief and Reform Legislation”) (Primacy Strategy Group)
Effective: Some parts apply in 2025; many changes take effect after June 30, 2025 (taxable events after that date) according to the effective dates document. (North Dakota Legislative Branch)

📝 What it does (5th-grade level)

  • Lowers how much property tax residents must pay: the state gave $408.9 million in tax relief. (Primacy Strategy Group)

  • Reform might include reducing tax rates, increasing exemptions, or shifting how property values are assessed for tax purposes. (The summary didn’t list all line-items, but it’s large and intended to ease property tax burden. ) (Primacy Strategy Group)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Helps taxpayers pay less in property taxes starting mid-2025 (after June 30 for many provisions). (North Dakota Legislative Branch)

  • State or local governments may see lower revenue and may need to make up funds via other sources or reduce some spending.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: Homeowners, renters (if landlords pass savings through), and seniors on fixed incomes.

  • Affects: Local governments, school districts, infrastructure budgets that depend heavily on property tax income.

⚙️ Who sponsored / initiated & who opposed

  • Sponsored by ND legislative leadership and Gov. Armstrong as part of his tax relief agenda. (Primacy Strategy Group)

  • Support from taxpayers and groups advocating for lower taxes. Opposition possibly from those concerned about underfunding public services or local governments.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Immediate relief for property owners.

  • Helps people on fixed incomes or with high property tax burdens.

Cons:

  • Could strain budgets for schools, roads, and local services that rely on property taxes.

  • Might require trade-offs: cutting services, raising other taxes, or reducing public investment.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

North Dakota passed a $408.9 million property tax relief package effective for many taxable events after June 30, 2025 — homeowners should see savings, but local governments may have to adjust their budgets. (Primacy Strategy Group)

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found