Rhode Island State Laws

Law #1: Kratom Regulation & Sales Licensing (S.B. 0792 / H.B. 5565-A)

📝 What it does (5th-grade level)

  • Makes kratom (a plant product sometimes used like a stimulant or pain-reliever) legal under state law, but regulates it strictly: any manufacturer, distributor, importer or retailer must have a license. (Rhode Island Division of Taxation)

  • All sales must come through licensed parties; unlicensed kratom products can’t be sold. (Rhode Island Division of Taxation)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • The state will need to set up licensing, enforce rules, oversight by the Department of Health, etc. That’s some administrative cost. (Rhode Island Division of Taxation)

  • License fees might recoup some costs. Retailers/distributors pay to be licensed.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: People who want legal, regulated kratom access; public safety (safer product quality).

  • Affects: Kratom product makers/importers/retailers; folks who sell currently unlicensed or via informal channels.

⚙️ Who sponsored / Initiated vs. Who Opposed

  • Sponsored in the RI Legislature. (Exact sponsors not always highlighted in summary) (LegiScan)

  • Support likely from health regulators and those seeking regulation; opposition from those who believe kratom should remain banned or unregulated.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Brings safety, oversight, and clear rules for a previously unregulated product.

  • Protects consumers from potentially unsafe or mislabeled products.

Cons:

  • Could lead to delays / costs in licensing; small vendors may struggle.

  • Potential public health risks still exist depending on kratom use and dosage; regulation doesn’t remove all risks.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

Rhode Island’s Kratom Act (effective April 1, 2026) legalizes kratom under strict licensing rules—bringing safety and regulation to a previously unregulated market, with extra cost and compliance needed.

Law #2: Motor Fuel Tax Increase & Revised Adjustment Formula

📝 What it does

  • Raises the base motor fuel tax from previously lower rate (32 cents per gallon) to 40 cents per gallon as of July 1, 2025. (Rhode Island Division of Taxation)

  • Adjusts how future inflation-based increases are calculated. Instead of previous method, post-2027 adjustments will use a revised formula based on inflation as of September for the two years preceding, rounded to the nearest cent. (Rhode Island Division of Taxation)

  • Also changes where some of the new tax revenue goes: of the extra 3 cents, part is allocated to state transportation (DOT), part to public transit (RIPTA). (Rhode Island Division of Taxation)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • People buying gas will pay more per gallon. That increases cost for commuting, goods transport, etc.

  • State and transit get more revenue; could fund infrastructure or transit improvements.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: Public transit authority (RIPTA) and transport infrastructure via extra funds.

  • Affects: Drivers, businesses with transportation costs, consumers (via cost pass-through).

⚙️ Who sponsored / Initiated vs. Who Opposed

  • Enacted via budget/legislative leadership in RI 2025 session. (Stateside)

  • Support from those wanting improved transit or infrastructure; opposition likely from motorists or groups worried about cost of living increases.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • More funding for roads and transit.

  • Adjusts tax formula to better reflect inflation in future.

Cons:

  • Higher fuel costs for consumers.

  • Adds burden to low-income individuals who drive more or have no transit options.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

As of July 1, 2025, Rhode Island raised its motor fuel tax to 40¢/gal and changed how future increases are calculated; drivers pay more, transit & infrastructure get more money.

Law #3: Sales Tax on Short-Term Parking & Expanded Taxable Services

📝 What it does

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Adds some cost for consumers parking short-term (e.g. downtown, airport, hourly lots).

  • State collects more sales tax revenue.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: State budget and local governments by increasing revenue.

  • Affects: Drivers/taxpayers who use short-term parking; parking operators (they collect and remit tax).

⚙️ Who sponsored / Initiated vs. Who Opposed

  • Passed as part of RI tax legislative changes. (Rhode Island Division of Taxation)

  • Opposition likely from those who feel parking costs burdensome; support from budget/revenue advocates.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • More predictable revenue for state; closes tax gap.

  • Fairness: services are taxed like other services.

Cons:

  • Adds cost for parking, especially in urban areas.

  • Cumulative effects with other taxes may hit some consumers hard.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

Starting October 1, 2025, Rhode Island will apply its 7% sales tax to short-term parking and similar services — good for state revenue, less so for people parking regularly downtown or in high-cost areas.

Law #4: Medical Debt & Credit Reporting Reforms (SB 169 and SB 172)

  • Statute / Laws: Senate Bill 169 & Senate Bill 172 (2025) (Stateside)

  • Effective: Signed during 2025 session; date depending on statute but tracked as law in 2025. (Many took effect July 2025) (Stateside)

📝 What it does

  • SB 169 prohibits credit reporting agencies from listing consumers’ medical debt (under certain conditions) on credit reports. (Stateside)

  • SB 172 caps interest rates / fees on medical debt collection; protects consumers from high-cost interest or charges on medical debt. (Stateside)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Minimal direct state cost; largely regulatory oversight.

  • Could affect lenders/credit reporting agencies’ income or how they structure reporting; some costs passed through to those businesses.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: Patients with medical debt; people trying to fix credit or avoid penalties.

  • Affects: Credit bureaus, medical providers / debt collectors; insurers or hospitals who may face delays or limitations in collecting unpaid medical debt.

⚙️ Who sponsored / Initiated vs. Who Opposed

  • Sponsors include lawmakers focused on consumer protection. (Stateside)

  • Supported by health-consumer advocates; opposed by businesses that rely on debt collection or credit reporting practices.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Protects vulnerable consumers from being penalized for medical debt.

  • Could help people get better access to housing, credit if debt doesn’t appear on reports.

Cons:

  • May reduce incentives for medical providers to chase unpaid bills aggressively.

  • Lenders / credit-reporting agencies may shift costs elsewhere.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

Rhode Island passed SB 169 & SB 172 in 2025 to limit how medical debt shows up on credit reports and cap interest/fees on medical debt — helping people hurt by medical bills, with pushback from credit and collection industries.

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found