Tennessee State Laws

Law #1: Restricting Student Use of Phones & Smart Devices in Class (Schools Policy)

  • Statute / Bill: New law passed in 2025 – part of Tennessee bills that take effect July 1. School boards & public charter schools must adopt policies about cell phones, tablets, smartwatches. (https://www.wsmv.com)

  • Effective: July 1, 2025 (https://www.wsmv.com)

📝 What it does

  • Public school boards and charter schools must make rules that prevent students from using phones/smart devices during instructional periods (class time). (https://www.wsmv.com)

  • Some exceptions: students with disabilities may use devices if needed, or when device used for classroom presentations. (https://www.wsmv.com)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Pretty minimal for the state government.

  • Schools will incur costs/training to implement policies; maybe signage; teacher/staff compliance/training.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: Teachers and students by reducing distractions in class; students who struggle with focus or disruptions.

  • Affects: Students who use devices in class; parents who may have relied on devices for communication; schools must enforce new rules.

🧑‍⚖️ Who sponsored / who opposed

  • Passed by Tennessee legislature in regular session; signalled in news summaries. (https://www.wsmv.com)

  • Likely supported by education groups; possibly opposition from those who believe devices have educational or emergency utility.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Classrooms more focused; fewer distractions.

  • Encourages learning environment with fewer interruptions.

Cons:

  • Some students may find restrictions too strict.

  • Enforcement might be difficult / inconsistent across schools.

  • Device use for learning or emergencies might get caught in the restrictions.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

From July 1, 2025, Tennessee schools must limit student use of phones/smart devices during instructional time—aiming for better focus in classrooms, with extra effort needed by schools to enforce fairly.

Law #2: New Laws on Deepfakes, Lab-Grown Meat, Overdose Immunity & More (Multiple Areas)

  • Statute / Laws: Multiple bills taking effect July 1, 2025. (Axios)

  • Effective: July 1, 2025 for many of them. (https://www.wsmv.com)

📝 What it does

Some of the key highlights:

  • Criminal penalties if someone shelters undocumented immigrants (charged under “human smuggling”). (Axios)

  • Expanded “Good Samaritan” protections: people calling for help for someone overdosing (alcohol or drugs) get immunity. (Axios)

  • Payday lenders allowed to charge up to 36% interest on loans over $100. (Axios)

  • Lab-grown meat must have permits; can’t be labeled as “meat.” (Axios)

  • Foster care extended to age 23 for youth who are working or in school. (Axios)

  • Civil lawsuits now allowed for people harmed by sexually explicit AI-deepfakes. (Axios)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Admin & enforcement costs for new permit/licensing systems (lab-grown meat etc.).

  • Possible legal cost for defending or adjudicating lawsuits (deepfakes).

  • Some increased burden on regulatory agencies.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: Overdose victims or those helping them (via immunity); foster youth; consumers demanding transparency; those victimized by deepfake harms.

  • Affects: Lenders (payday), lab-grown meat companies, people providing shelter to undocumented folks, people making or distributing deepfake content.

🧑‍⚖️ Who sponsored / who opposed

  • Various sponsors for each law—legislature approved them. News reports mention Gov. Bill Lee signed many. (Axios)

  • Opposition likely from interest groups: payday lender critics, immigrant rights groups, free speech concerns for deepfake rules.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Broad protection & regulation in new technological, social, and health areas.

  • More safety and clear rules (deepfakes, lab meat, overdose help).

  • Support for vulnerable populations (foster youth).

Cons:

  • Some laws may impose heavy compliance/regulation costs.

  • Pay-day lender law potentially burdensome interest to borrowers.

  • Enforcement and clarity issues (how deepfake law works, permitting etc.).

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

On July 1, 2025, Tennessee rolled out several new laws covering deepfakes, lab-grown meat, overdose protections, loans, foster care age, and more—big step across tech, health, finance; with both protection gains and regulatory cost trade-offs.

Law #3: Municipal Sales Tax & Local Revenue / Revenue Department Changes (Tax Law Changes)

📝 What it does

Some specific tax changes include:

  • Withholding up to 15% of annual sales tax revenue allocated to municipalities with two or more outstanding late annual audits. (Tennessee State Government)

  • Exemption of certain sales for wine consumed at wineries from “liquor by the drink” tax when on winery premises. (Tennessee State Government)

  • Changes in how local occupancy tax applies (first 30 days stay in short-term rentals / hotels subject to occupancy tax on certain rental agreements). (Tennessee State Government)

  • New wholesale tax on vapor products (10%) and licensing requirements for retailers/distributors. (Tennessee State Government)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Municipalities with audit issues lose some revenue until audits are cleared.

  • Wine/farm producers benefit; tax revenue for liquor/tourism may shift.

  • Tax on vapor products adds cost to consumers, new collection for state.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: State revenue; municipalities that are compliant; wine producers and wineries on premises; public health advocates via vapor regulation.

  • Affects: Municipalities with audit issues; consumers of vapor products; retailers of such products; businesses in hospitality/short term rentals.

🧑‍⚖️ Who sponsored / who opposed

  • These are administrative or revenue department bills, part of broader budgeting and tax code reforms. (Tennessee State Government)

  • Opposition likely from business/tourism interests (on occupancy tax), discount vapor/lower end users, municipalities which might lose revenue.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Clamps down on audit delays; encourages financial accountability in municipalities.

  • Clarifies tax obligations, captures revenue from vapor product sales.

  • Benefits wineries and tourist sectors on winery premises.

Cons:

  • Consumers lose (vape costs up, occupancy rentals cost more).

  • Some local governments may suffer revenue losses or have to clean up audit issues at cost.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

Tennessee’s 2025 tax & revenue changes (effective many July 1) include stricter audit accountability for cities, new taxes on vapor products, occupancy taxes on rentals, and exemptions for winery wine sales — rebalancing revenue and compliance, with costs for consumers and municipalities trailing behind.

Law #4: Accreditation Stipend Increase for Counties Housing Felons (SB 0186)

  • Statute / Bill: SB 0186 — increases the accreditation stipend for eligible counties for each convicted felon housed in county facilities. (LegiScan)

  • Effective: May 9, 2025 (Public Chapter 531) (LegiScan)

📝 What it does

  • Counties that house convicted felons (i.e. county jails etc.) get a higher stipend (a type of state payment) for accreditation/standards for those facilities under certain conditions. (LegiScan)

💰 Cost to taxpayers / state budget

  • Increased payment from state budget to counties. The total depends on how many felons / how many counties qualify.

👥 Who it helps / affects

  • Helps: County governments, county jail facilities—funding for maintaining accreditation standards.

  • Affects: State budget; maybe taxpayers indirectly via state budget; counties that do not house many felons see less benefit.

🧑‍⚖️ Who sponsored / who opposed

  • Passed in 2025 legislature; becoming law. (LegiScan)

  • Likely support from counties and local officials; opposition limited (some concerns about cost).

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Better funding for county jails to meet accreditation standards (which may improve safety, standards, oversight).

  • Counties better able to maintain required accreditation benchmarks.

Cons:

  • Higher expenditure for state; could squeeze other budget items.

  • Counties that are failing accreditation or with fewer inmates may gain less benefit.

🗳️ The Ballot Beacon Takeaway

SB 0186 took effect May 9, 2025: Tennessee will pay counties more per convicted felon housed to help fund accreditation of local jails — boosting standards, with bigger price tag for the state.

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found